(Even more of) Your Questions Answered
Good evening folks. I was able to work my way through the third of four parts of the most recent SBI Q&A session. There some very good and interesting questions in this batch, including asking for my takes on best American field players ever and best strikers in the world right now. There's a little something for everybody.
I will look to finish off the final quarter of the most recent Q&A session by tomorrow so I can clear the way for a new Q&A session on Thursday or Friday so stay tuned for that.
For now, here are a few more of your questions answered:
PHILLYPRIDE- How do you think Chicago's Sector Latino and Section 8 can succeed in their goals regarding Monterrey security and club policies? See http://www.section8chicago.com/jm3/ if you're unfamiliar.
ROBINX- Are you familiar with organization of the youth leagues beginning when they are 4 or 5 going all the way to U-18? It seems like the US Youth Association is trying to have a very structured system for the very best players. The biggest problem with the system now is the cost to the parents. It doesnt awlays end up with the best kids in the soccer acadamies, its the kids whose parents can afford to shell out the 4 or 5 thousand bucks a year.
GEOFF- I take it since you have FSC you watch the Fox Football Fone-In? I was just wondering what your thoughts were on Nick Webster and Steve Cohen? Have you listened to World Soccer Daily? I don't like how they rip MLS like they do and of course since Steve is bias towards Chelsea he always rips into Liverpool. Thanks again for all you do!
Thank you.
TOM- What is the best way to start a career with MLS (not as an athlete)?
- Claudio Reyna
- Landon Donovan
- John O'Brien
- Clint Mathis
- John Harkes
- Brian McBride
- Eddie Pope
- DaMarcus Beasley
- Tab Ramos (born in Uruguay but raised here)
- Eric Wynalda
- Marcelo Balboa
I have that same dilemma with the U.S. and Bolivia, but my fears wont be realized any time soon so ha!
also, how hard would it be to get a job working at a newspaper covering an MLS team with a straight up first year out of college (UCSD) with a journalism and economics double major?
my plan is bulletproof so far:
1) graduate from college
2) apply for job
3) ????????
4) PROFIT!!!!!!!!
but more seriously though, my dream job would be the former job of Marc de Grandpre as GM of RBNY, is that an impossible dream?
DAN FLYNN- It seems that the US is now producing young players with some decent skill and ability. We are gonna be forced to hire qualified competent coaches soon as it becomes clear the problem is with us, and not the players anymore. What can we do to keep the good ole boy club intact?
Especially at youth level where my loyatlies really are, and it's money, not the US Nats.
- Fernando Torres
- Zlatan Ibrahimovic
- Wayne Rooney
- Luca Toni
- David Villa
- Ruud van Nistelrooy
- Lionel Messi
- Didier Drogba
- Karim Benzema
- Robinho


Ives Galarcep is an American soccer columnist for ESPNsoccernet.com and creator of SoccerByIves.net.
Have a tip, story idea or suggestion? Send it to:

"IVES- If you meant the Americans Abroad section, the definition has been player who were born and raised in the United States."
=============================================
I'm not sure why someone needs to have been born and raised in the U.S. to be considered an American.
I didn't live in the U.S. until I was 17, but the only passport I ever carried was and American one.
By your definition, Quentin Westberg is not an American abroad.
Posted by: fig | September 08, 2008 at 08:44 PM
Ives, do you think the San Jose Earthquakes will make the playoffs and if so why?
Posted by: Ricky | September 08, 2008 at 08:48 PM
Fair enough Fig, if you're the son of an American parent or parents who doesn't happen to live in the USA then yes you are American. I was thinking more of people who really had meager ties to the USA, like Jemal Johnson, whose family I believe was from the Caribbean but he happened to be born in Jersey and spent some early years here.
Ultimately, there's no easy definition. What I do know is that just because someone chooses not to represent the United States on the national team doesn't somehow change their status as an American.
Posted by: Ives | September 08, 2008 at 09:14 PM
"IVES- Very good question. That sounds like a very good idea, something FSC or ESPN Classic could do with ease. I agree with you that allowing fans to watch old games would help boost interest. We don't have to go way, way back. heck, I'd love to watch USA-Mexico and USA-Germany from the 2002 World Cup (I never did watch them on TV after being at both games). I would also love to see the qualifier against Trinidad & Tobago where Paul Caligiuri scored the crucial goal to send USA through to the 1990 World Cup)."
I agree that this is a great idea. Beyond showing classic US National Team games, I would love to see classic international games. Some of the World Cup games of the '70s would be great to see. I was not around when they took place, so I never experience those games, of which I have heard so many great stories.
Posted by: Soto | September 08, 2008 at 09:20 PM
I get what you're saying, Ives. Thanks for the response.
IMHO, I think that as long as a player abroad is:
a) eligible to play for the USMNT
and
b) has not ruled out playing for the USMNT,
then he should be considered an American abroad.
Posted by: fig | September 08, 2008 at 09:22 PM
Whatever happened to your info on why Jozy wasn't brought into camp this time?
Posted by: Ryan | September 08, 2008 at 09:38 PM
Americans don't play in Brazil or Argentina because if they're good enough to play in the first division there, than they could make more money playing in Europe (or the MLS). One USMNT player actually did play in Brazil a few years back (but can't remember who it was off the top of my head).
Posted by: Hincha Tim | September 08, 2008 at 10:24 PM
while I agree that having MLS teams more involved in player development is crucial for the league, I think the real future has to come from USSoccer. I know that DCU's teams are only U-16, U-18 right now (looking for a new U-15 now for next year's U-16). That's too late, really. it needs to be at U-12 or so to start looking for talent. and you're right, there need to be more of them, DC has around 50 players in the system, I assume other academies like NYRB are about the same. so that's what, 350 total U-16's getting this level of coaching and exposure? we need to triple that number. I think the new USSF academy system will help (as will places like Friedel's academy in Cleveland, I bet that won't be the last of such residential places)
now, developing professional coaches. The good thing is that we have our first real generation of international caliber players with international experience beginning to reach retirement age. (read: Jones, Cobi; McBride, Brian, etc) They understand the US system, they understand MLS. I think Cobi will be a head coach in MLS within two seasons, for instance. we also have a generation of players who have serious time in MLS, and can move into training roles. So that's coming, too.
so with that, what current US player (or player in the US now) do you see as a manager in the next few years?
Posted by: northzax | September 08, 2008 at 10:33 PM
I seem to recall that perhaps during or right after WC06 ESPN Classic did show some old WC games. Am I crazy or does someone else remember this?
Posted by: silent e | September 08, 2008 at 10:42 PM
Ives,
On my commute on Metro North I noticed some kids playing football in a lot in East Harlem. It reminded me that the sport is really from the inner city and totally organic.
My 6-year old daughter participated in a Red Bulls camp in the suburbs this past summer and all she talks about now is NYRB. It got me thinking that the team should really build more of a presence in the boroughs, at least to get some mind share and maybe win the hearts of the large immigrant population.
Cheers
Posted by: Pico | September 08, 2008 at 10:56 PM
On a side note, I recently volunteer to help coach my girl's football team and I was wondering if you know of any website not associated with USSoccer that provides training materials.
And just in case, Y Dale U.
Posted by: Pico | September 08, 2008 at 10:58 PM
Thanks for answering Ives.
I'm not seeing Italy falling either. They overcame a tricky game at Cyprus... Just ask us Irish from the euro qualifiers =(
I'm hoping we will, but I'm looking at the list of potential opponents in a playoff... There's some decently strong teams hanging out in second place. That's scary to me...
Posted by: mikeK | September 08, 2008 at 11:04 PM
Regarding the question about non-naturalized Americans. Dooley was not naturalized, he was American from the day he was born.
Posted by: Lloyd Heilbrunn | September 08, 2008 at 11:52 PM
Ives, I don’t know if anyone else here is interested but can you shed some light on High Def soccer broadcasting in this country. While I understand it is simply impossible for ESPN to broadcast some matches like the previous two U.S. qualifiers from Cuba and Guatemala in High Def due to logistical issues and the lack of technology available in those decrepit stadiums, I do not see how qualifiers / friendlies played here in the U.S. in some of the most advanced stadiums in the world are still frequently broadcast in standard def.
The same can be said for Fox Soccer Channel. Any idea when we can expect FSC to offer an HD feed. Again, I know its easier said than done when it comes to South American games for example, but what about the EPL & Seria A or CONCACAF qualifiers / friendlies taking place right here in the US? If you live in Europe and can watch an EPL or Champions League game in High Def via SKY HD, why are FSC and ESPN unable to utilize the same feed?
ESPN / ABC had no problem the past two major competitions broadcasting every match in HD here in the states while coincidently capturing their highest soccer ratings ever. When can we expect games to be broadcast in High Def on a more regular basis here in the states?
Posted by: txsoccer | September 09, 2008 at 12:20 AM
DJ Countess played in Argentina.
Posted by: MacAbuser | September 09, 2008 at 01:50 AM
1) Americans have played in Brazil and Argentina before. Cobi Jones and DJ Countess (mentioned above) come to mind.
2) One of the biggest reasons you don't see Americans there, besides obvious playing style differences, is that both countries have very strict foreign player rules.
Posted by: Ted | September 09, 2008 at 03:58 AM
There have also been a few Americans play in other South American leagues, too. Mark Schulte in Chile springs to mind.
Posted by: Brant | September 09, 2008 at 06:09 AM
Garber, Gazidis and Machnik have been entrenched (like cancer) in MLS for a good 10 years each. When do you see them being replaced, and by who?
Posted by: KingSnake | September 09, 2008 at 07:29 AM
Chase Hilgenbrinck played in Chile. The reason why you don't see more Americans playing in South America is money, as in a player of the caliber high enough to play in South America could play outside of South America for more money. That's why there are a lot of South Americans playing outside of South America and few non-South Americans playing there.
Posted by: Mike | September 09, 2008 at 08:29 AM
Interesting that your top 11 field players includes no outside backs.
Posted by: Chris | September 09, 2008 at 08:55 AM
Ives, Wayne Rooney does not belong among the top 10 strikers in the world. Not even close. Have you looked at his game over the last year?
Posted by: andrew in tampa | September 09, 2008 at 10:00 AM
Andrew, I've seen Rooney play plenty of times and while he didn't have the best year I still think he's one of the best in the world and one of the first strikers I'm picking if given the chance to pick strikers from all over the world. Yes, there are others who I could have considered, like Eto'o, Klose, Adebayor and Berbatov, but I still think Rooney is an elite striker. That's just my opinion. You can disagree.
Posted by: Ives | September 09, 2008 at 10:43 AM
For those interested in watching some "Classic" games, ESPN was showing stripped down one hour versions of all of the EURO Finals in the build up before EURO 2008. It was definitely fun to watch for histories sake, and also to see how far the game has come. So those games are out there, and it does seem like ESPN somehow had the rights to some of them, at least the old EURO finals.
Posted by: rob | September 09, 2008 at 12:22 PM
Thanks Ives,
I appreciate your perspective and I understand that the league is trying to put checks on costs but that's part of what I find so frustrating. A smart baseball team that can't spend as much as the other teams puts all its money into development. The only possible way for us to get inexpensive top talent into the league is to develop it ourselves and, instead of rewarding teams and proving incentives for developing talent, MLS is punishing them and saying, "you can spend all your money trying to develop young talent, but we probably won't let you keep those players." Under that system, would YOU bother investing a lot of money in development?
Posted by: Yossarian | September 09, 2008 at 02:13 PM