Monday Evening Ticker: More int’l players dropout due to injuries, panel to discuss offside rule change, and more

BY JUSTIN FERGUSON

The list of injured players staying out of this week’s international action keeps growing.

In the Monday Kickoff, SBI reported that Xavi, Bastian Schweinsteiger, Raphael Verane, Daniel Sturridge, Jermain Defoe and Michael Carrick will miss their nations’ midweek matches.

Now Petr Cech will miss the Czech Republic’s friendly against Turkey due to what may be a broken little finger. Czech FA spokesman Jaroslav Kolar said on Monday that Cech “will not play [on Wednesday] because he has a swollen or maybe even broken upper part of his little finger.”

Chelsea confirmed on its website that Cech has returned to the club for further evaluation on the injury, which the goalkeeper picked up during the Blues’ 3-2 loss at Newcastle on Saturday.

It is unknown if Cech will miss Chelsea’s weekend clash with Wigan Athletic.

Here are more stories to wrap up your Monday:

DORTMUND TRIO, KLOSE OUT FOR GERMANY FRIENDLY

Borussia Dortmund’s Marcel Schmelzer, Marco Reus and Mario Gotze will miss Germany’s friendly versus France on Wednesday. Schmelzer is unavailable due to an ankle problem, Gotze has the flu and Reus picked up an adductor muscle injury in the Bayer Leverkusen win on Sunday.

However, teammate Ilkay Gundogan will make the trip to Paris. The defender hurt his ankle in the Leverkusen match but is expected to suit up for the national team on Wednesday, pending fitness tests.

Joachim Löw will also be without veteran forward Miroslav Klose, who reportedly sustained a knee ligament tear during Lazio’s loss at Genoa on Sunday. The federation said that Klose will most likely need a minor operation to repair the damage.

IFAB TO DISCUSS OFFSIDE RULE CHANGE

The International Football Association Board will discuss a possible change to how officials interpret the offside rule when it convenes next month in Edinburgh, Scotland.

FIFA wants to know how the board can simplify the wording in Law 11, which states that players in an offside position can be called for “clearly obstructing an opponent’s vision or movements, or making a gesture or movement which in the opinion of the referee deceives or distracts an opponent.”

The association wants to take out the referee’s opinion out of the law and change it to penalize offside players who “clearly obstructing an opponent’s vision or challenging an opponent for the ball.”

IFAB will also look at a loophole in the Laws concerning uncontested dropped balls, which came to light after Shaktar Donetsk scored a controversial goal against FC Nordsjaelland in a Champions League group match.

The board, which includes FIFA and four British associations, will be updated during the meeting on the introduction of goal-line technology at the 2014 World Cup.

QUICK KICKS

Roberto Mancini says that the race for the English Premier League title “is not over” and that there is time for his Manchester City side to make a comeback. (REPORT)

A UEFA report says that while player salaries continue to skyrocket, losses by top division clubs have tripled over the past five years. (REPORT)

Stoke City striker Michael Owen will not face disciplinary action for his incident with Mikel Arteta during his club’s 1-0 loss to Arsenal on Saturday. (REPORT)

————————

What do you think of these reports? Worried about Cech’s injury? How do you think this depleted German side will do in the friendly with France? What are your thoughts on the proposed offside rule change?

Share your thoughts below.

This entry was posted in European Soccer, Featured, International Soccer. Bookmark the permalink.

9 Responses to Monday Evening Ticker: More int’l players dropout due to injuries, panel to discuss offside rule change, and more

  1. MemRook says:

    “… maybe even broken upper part of his little finger.”

    Cutest injury ever?

  2. ManicMessiah says:

    Roberto Mancini, when he’s down by 9 points he insists he’s in the race, when he’s ahead last year he insists they are not the favorites.

    As far as the offsides rule, simpler is better when dealing with referees.

    • David JS says:

      As far as Mancini goes, I think last season everyone KNEW they were right in it (or slight favorites) so he was just trying to take the pressure off his players by downplaying their chances. This season I think he is just trying to keep morale up in the locker room because it’s looking more and more like they actually might be out of the title race. Different situations that he’s approaching in different manners…not saying it’s brilliant, just trying to make sense of his perspective.

  3. bottlcaps says:

    I am always dubious of the way FIFA handles injuries for friendlies.
    Essential they give Carte Blanche to club teams to determine if the player is injured. The national federation then has to jump through hoops to get access to the player to determine if the injury is sufficient to keep the player off. Players will not argue against their clubs even though many know it’s BS because the club team pays the freight for the player for the year.

    Teams like the US would have to keep a USMNT physician on call in Europe to check the players if they have doubts.

    That is why the US never questions the calls by the clubs even though the player seems fine and is sometimes seen playing before and after the friendly. Clubs no this and play this game all the time to avoid having thier players tired from the travel prior to key club games.

    • Beto says:

      Yup add this to fact this is the last friendly before a series of qualifiers so its the time skip if you have the slightest injury.

    • John says:

      Don’t forget that the club teams are the ones who have the most to lose when players travel for international games. Those teams are the ones paying the players’ salaries and put in all the time/effort to keep them fit, in form, and improving. The NTs are able to pick/choose the players while not having to do much of anything in the way of supporting them.

  4. Brett says:

    “The association wants to take out the referee’s opinion out of the law and change it to penalize offside players who “clearly obstructing an opponent’s vision or challenging an opponent for the ball.”

    How is this possible when the referee’s judgement will still determine whether or not the call is made?

    • Nate says:

      Since it’s going to be the referee’s discretion anyway, it gives unnecessary leeway to call offsides to have the additional wording there.